Sensory Details in Product Reviews: What AI Considers Authentic

Sensory details—descriptions of how things feel, look, sound, smell, or taste—are powerful Experience signals in EEAT because they're nearly impossible to fake without real interaction. Generic reviews describe features; authentic reviews describe experiences. When you write “the keyboard has a satisfying tactile bump at 45g actuation” instead of “the keyboard is good,” you're demonstrating physical interaction.
Key Takeaways
- • Sensory language proves physical interaction with products
- • Aim for 10+ sensory words per review for strong experience signals
- • Five senses: Touch, sight, sound, smell, taste (when applicable)
- • Be specific: “Clicky” beats “good sound”
What Are Sensory Details? #
Sensory details describe experiences through the five senses:
Touch/Tactile #
- Texture: smooth, rough, grainy, slippery, sticky
- Temperature: warm, cool, cold, hot
- Weight: heavy, light, substantial, featherweight
- Pressure: firm, soft, springy, resistant
- Physical feedback: clicky, mushy, tactile, linear
Visual #
- Color accuracy: vibrant, muted, accurate, oversaturated
- Brightness: bright, dim, blinding, subtle
- Clarity: sharp, blurry, crisp, hazy
- Finish: glossy, matte, reflective, brushed
Auditory #
- Volume: loud, quiet, whisper-quiet, deafening
- Quality: tinny, full, boomy, balanced
- Character: sharp, mellow, harsh, warm
- Physical sounds: clicky, thocky, rattly, solid
Smell (When Relevant) #
- New product smell: plasticky, chemical, fresh
- Food/beverage: aromatic, earthy, fruity
- Materials: leather, wood, metallic
Why Sensory Details Signal Authenticity #
Sensory descriptions are hard to fabricate because:
- They require physical access: You can't describe how something feels without touching it
- They're subjective: Each person's sensory experience is unique
- They're specific: Generic descriptions (“feels good”) vs. detailed (“smooth with slight give”)
- They're hard for AI to generate: LLMs struggle with convincing sensory fabrication
Without Sensory Details
“The headphones have good build quality and comfortable fit.”
Could be copied from any marketing material.
With Sensory Details
“The ear cups have soft, cool memory foam that molds to my ears without pressure. The headband has a slight squeak when adjusting.”
Clearly based on physical experience.
Sensory Vocabulary by Product Type #
Tech Products #
KEYBOARDS: clicky, tactile, linear, mushy, thocky, rattly,
smooth, scratchy, springy, heavy
DISPLAYS: vibrant, punchy, accurate, oversaturated, washed out,
bright, dim, crisp, sharp, glossy, matte
BUILD: solid, creaky, plasticky, premium, sturdy, flimsy,
cold (metal), warm (plastic), heavy, light
AUDIO: tinny, boomy, balanced, muddy, clear, harsh, warm,
spacious, narrow, detailedPhysical Products #
FABRIC: soft, scratchy, smooth, textured, breathable, stiff,
silky, rough, cottony, synthetic
LEATHER: supple, stiff, smooth, grainy, cold, warm,
plasticky, genuine
METAL: cold, smooth, brushed, polished, lightweight, heavy,
solid, hollow
FURNITURE: firm, soft, supportive, sagging, squeaky, solid,
wobbly, sturdyFood & Beverage #
TEXTURE: crispy, chewy, tender, tough, creamy, grainy,
smooth, crunchy, flaky
TASTE: sweet, salty, bitter, sour, umami, rich, bland,
complex, one-note
AROMA: fragrant, earthy, fruity, smoky, fresh, stale,
pungent, subtleBefore and After Examples #
Laptop Review #
Before (Generic):
The MacBook Pro has excellent build quality and a great keyboard. The display is very good.
After (Sensory-Rich):
The aluminum chassis feels cold to the touch and has zero flex when pressed. The keyboard has a satisfying tactile bump with quiet, dampened sound—noticeably less clacky than my previous ThinkPad. The display is almost too bright at max settings, with colors that pop more than my calibrated external monitor.
Headphone Review #
Before (Generic):
The Sony WH-1000XM5 are comfortable and sound great with excellent noise cancellation.
After (Sensory-Rich):
The ear cups have plush, cool protein leather that doesn't get sweaty during 4-hour sessions. The clamping force is lighter than the XM4—noticeable relief on my glasses frames. Sound signature is warm with slightly boosted bass that rumbles on EDM tracks. The noise cancellation creates an almost eerie silence—I can't hear my mechanical keyboard two feet away.
Office Chair Review #
Before (Generic):
The Herman Miller Aeron is comfortable and supportive for long work sessions.
After (Sensory-Rich):
The mesh seat has a slight springiness that keeps you from sinking. After 8 hours, there's no hot spot—the mesh breathes unlike my old leather chair. The lumbar support has firm pressure that I initially thought was too aggressive but grew to appreciate. The armrests have a slightly textured surface that prevents slipping.
Best Practices for Sensory Writing #
Be Specific, Not Vague #
Vague: “It feels premium.”
Specific: “The brushed aluminum has a subtle texture under fingertips, and the weight feels substantial without being heavy.”
Use Comparisons #
Comparisons make sensory descriptions more relatable:
- “Softer than memory foam but firmer than down”
- “About as heavy as a hardcover book”
- “The click sounds like snapping a pencil, not a typewriter”
Add Context #
Context makes sensory details more useful:
- “Gets warm (40°C surface temp) after 30 minutes of gaming”
- “The fan noise is noticeable in a quiet room”
- “The keys feel mushier compared to my mechanical keyboard”
Quantity Guidelines #
| Content Length | Target Sensory Words |
|---|---|
| Short review (500 words) | 5-8 sensory details |
| Standard review (1000-1500 words) | 10-15 sensory details |
| In-depth review (2000+ words) | 15-25 sensory details |
Common Mistakes #
Overusing the Same Descriptors #
Bad: “The build is solid. The keyboard feels solid. The screen is solidly attached.”
Vary your vocabulary to maintain credibility.
Irrelevant Sensory Details #
Bad: “The software has a smooth interface.”
Software doesn't have physical texture. Use appropriate language: “responsive,” “fluid animations.”
Exaggeration #
Bad: “The most comfortable chair ever created.”
Extreme claims undermine credibility. Be descriptive without hyperbole.
Frequently Asked Questions #
How do I add sensory details to software reviews? #
Focus on the experience of using software: response time (snappy, laggy), animations (smooth, choppy), visual design (clean, cluttered). Describe your physical interaction—mouse movements, keyboard shortcuts, how it feels to navigate.
Can I have too many sensory details? #
Yes. Every sentence being sensory-focused becomes exhausting. Balance sensory descriptions with factual information, comparisons, and analysis. Aim for sensory details in key sections: build quality, comfort, sound, user experience.